#Cm hyper 212 evo review install
#Cm hyper 212 evo review full
#Cm hyper 212 evo review pro

It took less than 30 secs sustained load for it to throttle at stock settings. while waiting for my NH-D15 to arrive I was running the Hyper 212 EVO from my old computer on my new 9900k.

#Cm hyper 212 evo review full

You'll never get full performance out of a 9900k with your Hyper 212 EVO. You need to dissipate around 200W of heat if you're running at 4.6 Ghz and your cooler has a TDP of 150W. You'll be throttling in any stress test with a Hyper 212 EVO on a 9900k. Nice and quiet and good enough for me! The black looks nice had the RGB fan hooked to my ASUS mobo rolls slowly through the colors.A Noctua NH-D15 on a 9900k maxes out in the 70's degrees with no OC. With a i9-9900K and a 4.6GHz OC, I can run the fan at low speeds and have the temp max out at around 70C. It works fine as long as I don't go crazy overclocking the CPU. Johnpombrio said:I have the Hyper 212 EVO black edition which has a very similar mounting system.

#Cm hyper 212 evo review install

With the new Hyper 212 Evo v2 now available, those with fond memories of their previous Hyper 212РІР‚в„ўs now have the chance to install a piece of updated nostalgia into a modern, silent HTPC system or home server, or perhaps as a piece recommended by a mentor for a novice system builderРІР‚в„ўs first PC.

WeРІР‚в„ўd advise double checking the appropriate motherboard CPU_FAN header (or other chosen header) to make sure the cooler has the ability to cool effectively at appropriately reported CPU temperatures. There is also a slightly lower thermal signature in the adjacent regions at full speed, which indicates the added benefit of improved airflow.Р”В¬onsidering the low noise levels of the Hyper 212 Evo v2 even at full speed, having a quality fan curve which favors higher fan RPM is beneficial for any system installation.

#Cm hyper 212 evo review pro

Our Flir One Pro thermal imaging camera shows some noticeable differences in heat soak throughout the cooling tower itself between 50% and 100%, which is to be expected. Omitting AVX instruction sets allows for accurate, 100% loads at chosen clock speeds, while allowing AVX instructions would provide higher, albeit, unrealistic synthetic CPU loads and excessive heat production, less indicative of real-world use. Prime95 v29.4b8 (no AVX) is used for two-hour intervals, one managing fans at 50% PWM and the other at 100% PWM with RPM measurements being taken every three seconds and averaged across the duration of each two-hour capture.

7C70v12)Р”В¬orsair Dominator Platinum RGB, 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3600Р”В¬rystalFontz CFA-633-TMI-KU, 4x Dallas One Wire WR-DOW-Y17 sensorsР”В¬orsair Commander Pro, 100%/50% PWM Speed profiles (liquid cooling pump always if applicable)Р”Вata comparisons are based on data collected from testing performed on our new Intel i9-10850K system, including re-visiting many previously covered products which were originally covered on the prior testing platform which pivoted around an i7-5930k (4.20ghz Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO V2 at Amazon for $39.99 Intel Core i9-10850K LGA1200 (Comet Lake), all 10 cores 4.6Ghz 1.190v, (3.60Ghz stock speed, single core boost 5.2Ghz)